The only FDA-approved treatment evaluated in 2 large multicenter studies of patients with Peyronie's disease1*
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that evaluated both erectile curvature and Bother score1,2
- Studies 1 and 2 were published in The Journal of Urology as IMPRESS I and II (The Investigation for Maximal Peyronie’s Reduction Efficacy and Safety Studies).
- 551 received XIAFLEX®, 281 received placebo.1
- All Intent-to-treat (ITT)=randomized men who received at least 1 dose of study drug.3,4
- Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population=patients with erectile curvature deformity measurement and Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ) assessment at baseline, and at 1 or more subsequent time points, and who had engaged in vaginal intercourse within 3 months prior to each PDQ assessment.1
Study design
The efficacy of
Before the first dose of study drug was administered, eligible patients were stratified by the degree of curvature deformity (30°–60°, and 61°–90°) and then randomized into 2 treatment groups to receive either
Study entry
- In Studies 1 and 2, the co-primary endpoints were1:
- The percentage change from baseline to Week 52 in erectile curvature deformity (erectile curvature)
- The change from baseline to Week 52 in the Bother domain score of the PDQ
- Patients must have had erectile curvature deformity of ≥30 degrees in the stable phase of Peyronie’s disease1
- Patients were excluded if they had a ventral curvature deformity, an isolated hourglass deformity, or a calcified plaque that could have interfered with the injection technique1
- A total of 156 patients presented with plaques that showed some calcification that did not interfere with the injection of
XIAFLEX® , as identified using ultrasound or X-ray5
- A total of 156 patients presented with plaques that showed some calcification that did not interfere with the injection of
- At baseline, penile pain was either not present or was mild in most (98%) patients1
- At baseline, approximately 50% of patients in the
XIAFLEX® clinical trials had a history of erectile dysfunction1
Improvement in erectile curvature after up to 4 cycles of XIAFLEX® from baseline to Week 52 (co-primary endpoint)1
MEN WHO RECEIVED XIAFLEX® ACHIEVED THE FOLLOWING TREATMENT DIFFERENCE IN ERECTILE CURVATURE COMPARED TO PLACEBO1†
Study 1
17.2%
treatment difference
vs placebo
P<0.01
Study 2
11.4%
treatment difference
vs placebo
P<0.01
Mean percentage change, treatment difference, 95% CI, and P value were based on an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with factors for treatment, stratum of baseline erectile curvature, and their interaction and using last observation carried forward (LOCF) in the mITT population. The mITT population was defined as all randomized subjects who had both an erectile curvature deformity measurement and a PDQ assessment at baseline and at one or more subsequent time points.1
Study 1 Treatment Difference (95% CI):
Study 2 Treatment Difference (95% CI):
Significant reduction in Patient-Reported Bother (co-primary endpoint)1
- The reduction in the Bother domain score was numerically similar between patient groups stratified by degree of baseline curvature deformity (30 to 60 degrees, and 61 to 90 degrees).
What is Patient-Reported Bother domain score?
- Co-primary endpoint in clinical trials was Patient-Reported Bother domain score change from baseline to Week 521
- The Bother domain score is a composite of the following patient-reported items6-7:
- Intercourse
- Erection appearance
- Erection pain
- Intercourse frequency
Mean change in Patient-Reported Bother from baseline to Week 52 - Studies 1 and 21
Mean change, treatment difference, 95% CI, and P value all based on an ANOVA model with factors for treatment, stratum of baseline erectile curvature, and their interaction and using LOCF in the mITT population. The mITT population was defined as all randomized patients who had both an erectile curvature deformity measurement and a PDQ assessment at baseline and at one or more subsequent time points.1
P<0.05.
Adverse reactions
Adverse reactions in Study 1 and Study 2 combined occurring in ≥1% of patients treated with XIAFLEX® and
also at a frequency greater than placebo-treated patients after up to 4 treatment cycles1
- Includes: injection site hematoma and penile hematoma were reported with the verbatim term of penile bruising or injection site bruising in 87% of patients.
- Includes: injection site swelling, penile edema, penile swelling, local swelling, scrotal swelling, and injection site edema.
- Includes: injection site pain, penile pain, and injection site discomfort.
- Includes: contusion, ecchymoses, penile hemorrhage, and injection site hemorrhage.
- The majority of patients with Peyronie's disease experienced at least 1 adverse reaction (92%
XIAFLEX® -treated patients, 61% placebo-treated patients)1 - Most adverse reactions were local events of the penis and groin and the majority of these events were of mild or moderate severity, and most (79%) resolved within 14 days of the injection1
- Severe penile hematoma or severe injection site hematoma were reported in 33/551 (6.0%) of patients treated with
XIAFLEX® and 0/281 (0%) of placebo-treated patients, in Studies 1 and 2 combined1 - A popping noise or popping sensation in the penis, sometimes described as "snapping" or "cracking," and sometimes accompanied by detumescence, hematoma, and/or pain, was reported in 73/551 (13.2%) of patients treated with
XIAFLEX® and 1/281 (0.3%) of placebo-treated patients1